tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9539359.post5797974225708420548..comments2023-10-24T10:06:05.391-05:00Comments on Instructivist: Educationist misconceptionsInstructivisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01652458042291988959noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9539359.post-75286536276072434942007-03-09T06:51:00.001-06:002007-03-09T06:51:00.001-06:00Vygotsky is what came to my mind as well.Vygotsky is what came to my mind as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9539359.post-22413134682177574022007-03-09T06:51:00.000-06:002007-03-09T06:51:00.000-06:00Vygotsky is what came to my mind as well.Vygotsky is what came to my mind as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9539359.post-54480834038076618542007-03-07T07:56:00.000-06:002007-03-07T07:56:00.000-06:00Pedantic Peasant has hit upon a true contradiction...Pedantic Peasant has hit upon a true contradiction. In my experience, die-hard constructivists seem intent on teaching their views and principles explicitly to others. Ironically, the group activities that they set up as illustration are a form of "drill and kill." The marriage of constructivism and top-down mandate is perturbing; what sort of children will they raise?Diana Senechalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11111547675530451414noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9539359.post-53519912874663756422007-03-06T10:05:00.000-06:002007-03-06T10:05:00.000-06:00This is a bit snarky, but ...Aren't (radical) cons...This is a bit snarky, but ...<BR/><BR/>Aren't (radical) constructivists hypocites? If all knowledge really is passive, and cannot be learned or disseminated by direct instruction, textbook, and so forth, then of what use can papers in favor of radical constructivism be? If ideas cannot be taught or related except passively, wouldn't that include the ideas behind their theory itself?<BR/><BR/>- Pedantic PeasantAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com